met data from this buoy are now feeding NDBC and the world

Last week I began feeding the 10-minute meteorological data from the two Tobago buoys to the National Data Buoy Center (NDBC).  A few days later NDBC notified me that those data feeds have been cleared for release to the Global Telecommunications Systems (GTS), which makes those data available for use by national weather services all over the world.

The Buccoo Reef buoy, which we informally refer to as BUTO1, has officially been designated 42087, which is in keeping with the custom of giving all-numeric designations to buoys.  The NDBC home page for the Buccoo Reef buoy may be found here:

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42087

This link has also been added to the 'Links' section on the right-hand side of this blog.

regards,
Mike J+

news and photo from Jonathan Gomez

[Note: the following is a slightly edited version of an email received from Jonathan Gomez (who, along with Addison Titus, have been maintaining the two CREWS buoys in Tobago since Jahson Alemu's departure last March) on May 23, 2016. This post is back-dated to that date.]

Click on image to see original size.

I'll give you some updates on the two CREWS.  Myself and Addison removed the EXOs in March for servicing and calibration. Also, both CREWS's support lines and buoy were cleaned of fouling and inspected for wear. Also, in early May the BIC hardware was installed and we took the opportunity to service and calibrate the Buccoo EXO again. The software still needs to be installed for the BIC sensor to be added to the data stream however. We plan to do this in the next few weeks with guidance from Jon Fajans.

There are a couple issues with data from the EXOs however. For the Buccoo EXO, all parameters are functioning fine while doing the calibrations, but when connected to the CREWS we aren't seeing Dissolved Oxygen and pH in the data streams.

It also turned out there was a mix-up with the DO sensor. It was accidentally installed on the Speyside EXO during the December 2015 servicing. This with be corrected on our next trip mentioned above.

I think those are the main issues we have at the moment, if we have any others I'll let you know.

Both ADCPs are deployed and running. We downloaded the last set of data in March. I believe Jahson would do this every 6 months so we are continuing with that schedule for now.

I've attached two photos of the CREWS for you, 'Picture 303' is the Speyside one, and 'Picture 255' is the Buccoo one.

posted by Mike Jankulak

status, based on examination of data stream

Having posted a similar message on the Angel's Reef (Speyside) buoy's blog, I am continuing my data analysis by turning to the Buccoo Reef buoy.  These messages were prompted by an absence of any updates from the field -- basically I am trying to see what we can conclude about local events based only on examination of the data.

As a reminder, this station's recent history includes its annual equipment swapout (December 9th - 10th, 2015), at which time the EXO Sonde was reinstalled after been absent for warranty repairs since July 17st, 2015.  These repairs included an upgrade to a titanium bulkhead and the replacement of the CT module (conductivity/temperature sensor, which reports salinity as well) with an improved CT2 module.  It was hoped that the reengineered CT2 module would eliminate the many problems with failures of the temperature and salinity parameters experienced over this station's lifetime since late 2013.  After the 12/10/2015 swapout was completed, no further updates were received apart from an announcement on February 5th, 2016, that Jahson Alemu would no longer be our primary local contact for the Tobago buoys.

As of May 16th, 2016, the following observations can be made about this buoy's data stream:

• The EXO Sonde was indeed reconnected during the annual swapout and started producing data on December 10th, 2015, after an absence of nearly five months.
• The EXO Sonde went offline from March 16th to 19th, 2016. My guess would be that the instrument was removed for three days during some kind of maintenance operation, which seems likely considering that the EXO at the Angel's Reef buoy went offline for five days at the same time (March 18th - 23rd).
• The Buccoo Reef EXO additionally went offline twice in May, once for two hours on May 1st, 2016, and then again for one day from May 4th - 5th, 2016.
• Since last December, apart from the aforementioned interruptions in March and May, the EXO seems have produced consistent and reliable sea temperature data.
• Compared to the performance of the EXO at Angel's Reef, this Buccoo EXO's salinity data are more believable. In the absence of a second conductivity/salinity sensor on-site giving redundant data reports, nothing can be said for certain, but it is at least possible that the CT2 sensor at Buccoo Reef is producing reliable salinity data.
• As for the other EXO parameters: Turbidities might be okay; Chlorophyll, Blue-Green Algae and FDOM fluctuate above and below zero and those sensors may be bad (or badly calibrated); pH data are either garbage or missing; and dissolved oxygen values may be reasonable.
• The analog AirT/RH sensor remains offline, as it has been since early 2014. Based on my experience with a similar failure and repair at the Calabash Caye buoy I believe that this is likely to be a problem with buoy wiring and not a failure of the RM Young sensor itself.
• We do, however, have air temperature and humidity reports from the integrated WXT unit. Although these reports cannot be validated by redundant readings from the analog AirT/RH sensor, they appear to be believable.
• Wind speeds and directions, as well as barometric pressures, continue to be reported redundantly by multiple sensors, and all appear to be consistent and correct.
• Of the two diagnostic RH (humidity) sensors with the buoy's two sealed junction boxes (JBs), the "Met" JB humidity levels are perfectly dry, as they have been throughout this buoy's lifetime. However the "Main" JB humidity levels are all consistently above 80% and are a cause for concern.  The Main JB humidity levels were only moderate before the 12/10/2015 annual maintenance operation, and jumped much higher afterwards, suggesting that the Main JB may not have been sealed/dried properly, may require fresh desiccant, or may have developed some kind of leak/crack.  This JB's o-ring, desiccant and interior should be examined at the earliest possible opportunity.

We do not have any reports about how often the EXO Sonde's modules have been recalibrated on-site since December of 2015. According to the manufacturer many of these modules should be recalibrated on a monthly basis.

I will post any further updates that are received at AOML.  The next annual maintenance operation should be carried out this coming December, or earlier.

Mike J+